/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) scientific discourse (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: scientific discourse
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignostxt577 - : characteristic of formal academic prose. They need to ‘tell’ as well as to ‘sell’ scientific research. In incorporating features of both scientific discourse, didactic discourse and persuasive discourse, the present analysis supports the view that “the media context is constituted as a space between the primary ‘context of production’ of scientific research and ‘non-specialist contexts’ of wider society” (^[182]Motta Roth & Scotti Scherer, 2016: 174 ).
Evaluando al candidato scientific discourse:
scientific discourse
Lengua:
Frec: 50
Docs: 35
Nombre propio: / 50 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.150 = ( + (1+0) / (1+5.6724253419715)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| scientific discourse |
: Bazerman, Ch. (1998). Emerging perspectives on the many dimensions of scientific discourse. En J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science. Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 15-28). London: Routledge. : Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2001). Syntactic differences in oral and written scientific discourse: The role of information structure. ASp: La revue du GERAS, 31-33, 19-37. : Gunnarsson, B. (1997). On the sociohistorical construction of scientific discourse. En B. Gunnarson, P. Linell & B. Nordberg (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. 99-126). Essex: Longman. : Halliday, M. A. K. (1990). The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: Charles Darwin's The Origin of the Species. In C. De Stasio, M. Gotti & R. Bonadei (Eds.), La rappresentazione verbale e icónica (pp. 57-80). Milano: Guerini. : Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431-473. [DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci1604_3] . : León, J.A. & Peñalba, G. (2002). Understanding causality and temporal sequence in scientific discourse. En J. Otero, J.A. León & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 199-221). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Luzón, M. J. (2013). Public communication of science in blogs: Recontextualizing scientific discourse for a diversified audience. Written Communication, 30(4), 428-457. [216]https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313493610 : Martín-Martín, P. (2005). The rhetoric of the abstract in English and Spanish scientific discourse. Berna: Peter Lang. : Nwogu, K. (1995). Structuring Scientific Discourse. Using the Given-New Perspective. English Teaching Forum 33(4), (pp. 22-27). : Penrose, A. & Katz, B. (2004). Writing in the Sciences: Exploring conventions of scientific discourse. Nueva York: Longman. : Prelli, L. (1989). A Rhetoric of Science. Inventing Scientific Discourse. Columbia, USA: University of South Carolina Press. : Randaccio, M. (2004). Language change in scientific discourse. Journal of Science Communication, 3(2), 1-15. : SalagerMeyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. En T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications (pp. 105118). Washington, D.C.: USIA. : Veel, R. (1997) Learning how to mean-scientifically speaking: apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school in F. Christie and J.R. Martin (Eds.) Genre and institutions: social process in the workplace and school. London: Continuum. : Viechnicki, G. B. (2002).Evidentiality in scientific discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA. |